<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Another Negative: Senate Conservatives Fund Airs New Spot &#8216;New Generation&#8217;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.theokie.com/another-negative-senate-conservatives-fund-airs-new-spot-new-generation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.theokie.com/another-negative-senate-conservatives-fund-airs-new-spot-new-generation/</link>
	<description>Politics, Oklahoma Style.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2014 19:43:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: BigMamaTEA		</title>
		<link>https://www.theokie.com/another-negative-senate-conservatives-fund-airs-new-spot-new-generation/#comment-221377</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BigMamaTEA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2014 19:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theokie.com/?p=11660#comment-221377</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Careful Oklahoma voters, Do NOT let even Oklahoma media set the narrative.  The headline states &quot;Another Negative.&quot;  Since when did factually stating an opponents voting record become a negative ad?

I&#039;m used to the national media trying to control the narrative; but I thought Oklahoma journalists would behave more professionally.  {silly me!}]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Careful Oklahoma voters, Do NOT let even Oklahoma media set the narrative.  The headline states &#8220;Another Negative.&#8221;  Since when did factually stating an opponents voting record become a negative ad?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m used to the national media trying to control the narrative; but I thought Oklahoma journalists would behave more professionally.  {silly me!}</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
