Dr. Coburn Calls for Administration to Cancel 100 City Tour Promoting Federal Spending on Eve of Sequestration in Letter to OMB

As the White House spouts to the public the possible impacts of sequestration on government programs for the poor and middle class, food safety and the defense of our nation, the Administration continues to spend on a 100 city cross country tour promoting federal aid and spending to communities. If the Administration is serious about preventing spending cuts on programs many consider vital, how can they also promise more financial assistance, and more importantly, how can they afford this mammoth cross country tour?

Here is a link to an article highlighting the first of the 100 visits in Beaverton, Oregon.

Full text of Dr. Coburn’s letter is printed below and is also available here:

February 21, 2013

 

Jeffrey Zients

Deputy Director for Management

White House Office of Management and Budget Executive Office Building

725 17th Street, NW

Washington, DC 20503

Dear Director Zients,

Much is being made about the possible impact of sequestration on government programs for the poor and middle class, food safety, and the defense of our nation. It is somewhat surprising, therefore, for the White House to be headlining a 100 city government spending tour, transporting representatives from multiple departments and various agencies around the country to promote federal largess. If Washington is truly cutting spending on missions many consider vital, how can we at the same time promise and promote more financial assistance, much less afford this mammoth 100 city cross country tour?

The first stop of the 100 city “Connecting to Your Community” tour in Beaverton, Oregon featured representatives from the White House, the Department of Labor, the Environmental Protection Agency, the Department of Transportation, and the Department of Housing and Urban Development. While the city most likely appreciated so many officials traveling across the country to visit, Beaverton has already proven itself quite adept at obtaining federal funds which makes the trip seem even more unnecessary. Since 2011, the city has received nearly $2 million in federal grants and assistance. Beaverton has even hired a consulting firm to apply for grants and the mayor’s “travels to the nation’s capital exceed those of his predecessors.” In 2011, the Mayor and nine other city and county representatives, for example, spent two full weeks in Washington, D.C. to visit with various federal officials and lobby for federal aid. The same information presented at the daylong symposium could have been shared with the mayor during his next visit to Washington or with the city’s consulting firm via electronic communication such as a teleconference, website, or email to save taxpayers money.

While well intentioned, I urge you to cancel the 100 city government spending tour.

I would also request the following information:

  • The total cost to the federal government for participation and support of the Beaverton Revitalization Roundtable;
  • The total number of federal employees who traveled to Beaverton for the Revitalization Roundtable; and
  • A complete listing of the other locations on the 100 city tour along with the dates for each event, an estimate of the number of federal employees attending each event, the projected or actual cost of each event, and a total estimated cost of the entire 100 city tour initiative including planning, travel, and staff time.

Thank you for your attention to this matter. I would appreciate a response no later than April 1, 2013. It is important that we as public officials lead by example and I look forward to continuing to work with you to save taxpayers money and better prioritize government spending.

Sincerely,

 

Tom A. Coburn, M.D.

Ranking Member

Committee on Homeland Security

and Governmental Affairs